First
Unitarian Church
90 Main Street
Worcester, Massachusetts USA
508.757.2708
HOME
Archive of Minister's Memos 1999-2001
| This is the weekend we get an extra hour. I am always
especially grateful that this annual gift arrives on a Sunday morning in
late October. One more hour to polish the sermon. One more hour to sleep
late. One more hour to read the Sunday New York Times.
But after the events of the last six weeks, an hour is not going to accomplish all that is needed. The world has been a stunningly demanding place, as of late. I don't think I'm the only one who would greatly benefit from a whole extra day inserted into this weekend. This day would need to be completely free of ordinary or irritating chores, (i.e. paying bills, doing laundry, going grocery shopping, etc.) We need a genuine Sabbath; a day of rest and renewal. A day dedicated to: * Sleep. At the very least naps. For all of us who have had some sleep disturbance connected to the images of war and murder and biological terrorism, it seems to me that a day ought to be set aside for the impromptu snooze, the unapologetic "No, I'm sorry, he can't come to the phone or attend that meeting; he is asleep…" How sweet to fall asleep on the sofa, while watching an old and comforting movie. * Leaf Peeping. Especially in New England, this is the week to catch the leaves at their most brilliant. Extreme beauty has a way of restoring our vision and clearing our minds. A drive out into the countryside, or even a walk through your neighborhood, can bathe you in golden light, with enough red and pink and yellow and green to lift your spirits. * Reading. How can you, or I or anyone else, develop a decent foreign policy and a thoughtful domestic strategy, if we can't read what's being written in the press, or absorb what is available on the Web? So much is now being debated and researched and discussed, that some Unitarian Universalists are falling behind! (I won't mention names.) Those of us who love information and analysis and who have strong opinions about how the world ought to be organized, need more time to read! And that's just for studying current events. There is a whole other category of essential reading, which has been euphemistically called, "recreational reading." But those of us who love fiction, and mysteries, and "light-weight magazines" understand that such reading is an important part of good mental health. A mind needs somewhere to go that seems safe, and fun and wholly diversionary. The "good life" has to include a place where the imagination is engaged and nourished. * Companionship. Who gets to spend enough time with friends? Are you able to "break bread" often enough with the family and the friends who feed your soul? An extra day would allow us to have at least one meal with some of the people who help us to laugh and to remember what counts. A good dinner with close friends can be as restorative as a small vacation. * Meditation and Prayer. Most of us will acknowledge that we need to make more time to center, to ask God for help, to focus on the sources of our courage. We claim that our busy schedules don't allow us the luxury of a spiritual discipline. An extra day would open us some space for the first commandment, "to love God with all your heart and soul and mind." * Volunteering. We keep saying we want to help. But when we are actually able to "love our neighbor," to "offer service to the stranger," we receive a kind of satisfaction that cannot be found anywhere else. Of course, not even an "extra day fantasy" can hold all the Sabbath that is needed. Already, my fantasy day is overcrowded with naps, autumn strolls, reading, dinner parties, meditation, and good works. I guess I'll have to find a way to fit these life-giving activities into the ordinary days ahead. Maybe, even a little every day. Possibly, even today. ©The Rev. Thomas Schade, 2001 |
| An astute observer of both nature and politics once observed that a
bird needs both a right wing and a left wing to fly at all, much less to
go in the direction that it wants to go. After the attacks of September
11, 2001, this insight is still true, but can be easily overlooked. People
(and nations) going through periods of stress and grief often misplace
their anger and are comforted with familiar fights with familiar adversaries.
And who is more familiar to us than our everyday political competitors?
Remember that old TV commercial in which the announcer urgently asked, as though it was one of the great philosophical conundrums of the modern age: "CERTS! Is It a Breath Mint? Or a Candy Mint?" Fortunately before the family could choose sides and start throwing popcorn at each other, they would let us know that CERTS is, in fact, both. Whew! What a relief! It is also a relief to remember both the Left and the Right bring invaluable insights to the shaping of our response to this new situation. The Insights of the Right: The Right reminds us that it is the first duty of the government to protect us from our enemies, both foreign and domestic, to ensure the peace and safety of the people, and to maintain the rule of law and civil order. The Right questions if there is ever a justification for violations of the law, and attacks on the safety of the people. It brings a laser like focus on a single question: what must be done to prevent this from ever happening again and includes among the steps that must be done, the finding and punishing of those who did it. The Right believes that punishment is a deterrent. The Right reminds us that the government must have at hand the tools and powers it needs to do this job. The Right also understands that a sense of national solidarity and patriotism is among the strengths of the people and the nation. The clarity that the Right brings to this situation is its laser like focus, and its willingness to subordinate all other concerns to the resolution of this problem. The Insights of the Left: The wisdom of the Left lies not in its laser-like focus, but in its appreciation for the complexity of every situation. It reminds us that history is an ongoing process in which all elements are acting and reacting to each other. It wants us to understand all the events that have led up to the present moment, and all the possible consequences of each of our possible reactions. It reminds us that the world is a vast and diverse place, and that all of the actors in the present drama have their own understandings of right, wrong, justice and injustice. The Left reminds us that most of the world’s people are not actors in these political and historical dramas, but simple, ordinary, and innocent people trying to survive in a hostile world. The Left urges us to develop our sense of loyalty and solidarity with people the world over and to not indulge a childlike sense that no one anywhere could ever have a good reason to be angry at the United States. The Left is particularly frustrated these days; I sense that it feels that its insights and understandings are not heeded, nor appreciated, by governmental leaders, or by their fellow citizens. But the liberals, the pacifists, the peace activists, and the internationalists should take heart. Two of their biggest fears have not materialized. There has been no spasm of blind violent rage in the form of massive and indiscriminate bombing of Afghanistan, at least not to date. And while there have been far too many incidents of bias and hate crimes against Arab or Muslim people, community leaders everywhere, from the President on down, have done whatever they could to protect innocent people from misdirected rage and bigotry. Mosques and Islamic centers are also reporting receiving an unprecedented wave of gestures of solidarity and concern. Much of this is due to the good works of the Left over the years. While policy seems to have a mostly rightward cast right now, it is clear that the concerns of the Left are having an influence on it. And every citizen would be wise to heed the Left’s advice to seek new and more self-aware understandings of all the issues at work in the present moment. CERTS is both a breath mint and a candy mint. Food can both taste good and be good for you. Either/Or choices usually come down to Both/And. The Right and the Left bring "gifts of different measure." Have we hearts large enough to accept both? ©The Rev. Thomas Schade, 2001 |
| In the fall of 1970, it was still possible to travel
to India over-land. I entered Afghanistan with my friend, Lolly, and about
ten other college students from around the world. We were the first on
the bus in Herat (near the Iranian border), and we went to sit in the back.
About forty Afghani men entered after we did, and filled up the front and
middle seats. When these men saw two women in the back of the bus with
uncovered faces, they stared at us with astonishment. Every Afghani man
on that bus twisted around in his seat, in order to take in the extraordinary,
startling sight: female faces. Before that moment, the only woman's face
they had ever seen was their mother, or a sister, or their wife. The men
stayed twisted in their seats, staring at us, for the entire ten hour trip
to Qandahar.
Even before the Taliban, in fundamentalist Islamic culture, westerners have been understood as a profound threat. Women are kept invisible. The very idea of women with faces, women being educated, women travelling alone, women being independent is deeply disturbing to their world view. They also feel violated by the ideas of democracy, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, and an open society. It should not have come as such a surprise that many of
these radical fundamentalist extremists want us dead. They want western
civilization destroyed. And the terrorists' September 11th strike on our
shores was a devastating blow.
I can only surmise that what he meant was that we are a remarkably trusting and open and unguarded society. Bin Laden's idea of a well-fortified, secure country is one with a totalitarian government, with high walls (and all women hidden behind those walls). There would be soldiers everywhere with assault rifles. No one would step out of line, because there would be a swift and brutal response. The extremists put their hopes in an environment of massive external force and rigid controls, where life and death powers would be exercised by only a few. Bin Laden and his ilk, see a democracy such as ours, as weak and chaotic, as militarily and morally vulnerable. He honestly believes he can bring down western civilization, and he has every intention of doing so. We, the American people, have woken up to a world where we have real enemies, who not only intend to do us great harm, but who did so September 11th. They have vowed that they will do it again. In a certain sense, you're not paying attention (you're not even lucid), if you aren't afraid of this threat. On the other hand, fear can cripple us, paralyze us, and weaken us worse than any terrorist attack. Fear is an adaptive, biological response to threat. "Flight" is sometimes the very best instinct when it comes to real danger. Many more people would have been killed in New York, if they had not run away from the World Trade Towers. But you can't run away from your home; your city: your country. The fact is we are vulnerable when we fly, and when we trust that our air, water, and food have not been poisoned. We do have a disciplined and wealthy enemy who has promised that they will do everything they can to hurt us. So what is the appropriate response? What is a normal response? What is a spiritually healing response? In the last few weeks, I've been troubled by a number
of distressing reactions that I believe are ultimately ineffectual or self-destructive.
They have included: (1) Blaming the victim (if America had a better foreign
policy, this wouldn't have happened); (2) The Political Cure: From both
the far right and the far left, I hear that if we could only get on exactly
the right policy track (either massive military force or pacifism), the
bad guys would go away; and, (3) The Quietist/Escapist Response: Do nothing.
Shut down. Hide. Be very quiet. Maybe it will all blow over and we can
return to our routines.
May I suggest a few other ways to live with the uncertainty and perceived danger in the immediate future? Of course, each of us will need to find our own way to breathe deeply. We need to inhabit the vulnerability of our lives (even before September 11th). But if you're feeling a little shaky, like most of the U.S. population, consider taking the following steps:
©The Rev. Dr. Barbara Merritt, 2001 |
| Recently, two books crossed my desk.
The first was the Oxford Dictionary of Allusions, a handy volume for decoding the meaning of a comparison to Uriah Heep (obsequiousness and false humility) or a reference to Loki (the Scandinavian God of mischief.) I thought, "What a useful book!" The thought did cross my mind that with it, I could seem much more educated, making learned allusions to classic literature, without actually having to read it. You see, I don’t enough time for classic literature, because I watch too much TV. So, I was also interested in the second book, "The Gospel of The Simpsons" by Mark I. Pinsky, a Conservative Jew who writes for Christianity Today. Now, if you knew who created Uriah Heep, and where Loki ruled, but draw a blank on "the Simpsons," you may want to turn the page now. I even give you permission to mutter something about the shocking decline in standards for seminary education. The Simpsons are, of course, the cartoon family who are the protagonists of the longest running prime time television show, shown on the Fox network on Sunday nights, and seemingly at all times on some station or another in syndication. They are not listed in the Oxford Dictionary of Allusions, but I would wager that many more people could name an essential character trait of Homer Simpson than of Uriah Heep. The Simpsons show satirizes everything in our culture with the freedom of an animated cartoon. Every episode is filled with dozens of visual jokes and sight gags. Marge Simpson, the mother, is shown reading a magazine entitled, "Better Homes than Yours." It is one of the few TV shows where characters themselves actually watch TV. And it is one of the few TV shows in which the characters go to church and have religious lives. According to Mark Pinsky, the series accurately satirizes the religious life of our culture. Unitarians have long chuckled over its many Unitarian jokes, but those are a part of a larger picture of American religion. Homer and Bart Simpson, every man and his son, are the main characters. To them, the goal in life is to do whatever you want while avoiding God, who is out to punish you. If you get into big trouble, it might make sense to pray for help, but it usually doesn’t work. When asked his religion by his children, Homer replies, "You know, the one with all the good ideas that don’t actually work out in practice: Christianity." And why should Homer and Bart have a positive view of religion? The series shows in full detail how they could believe that religion is boring, impractical and irrelevant. The family goes to the First Church of Springfield, where Homer snoozes and Bart squirms while the unctuous Rev. Lovejoy preaches dully on one of the more blood thirsty verses of scripture. Outside the sign reads, "Where God Gets Together with His Victims." Another side of religion is shown by Homer’s neighbor, Ned Flanders, a cheerfully faithful evangelical Protestant. Ned is goofy and a little out of touch. For example, the only video game that Ned’s children are allowed to play is Billy Graham’s Bible Verse Blaster. The aim of the game, to convert the heathen, is converted by hitting them with bible verses; a glancing blow turns them just to Unitarians. His family goes to church camp where they "can learn to be more judgmental." But Ned is not a hypocrite, and loving your neighbor is difficult when he is Homer Simpson. Rounding out the religious picture is daughter Lisa, not yet 10 years old, but already an environmentalist, a vegetarian, a free-thinking skeptic, a highly-principled do-gooder for whom the world is a constant disappointment, and who mostly gets on other people’s nerves. Are these our religious choices? Boring traditionalism, or an otherworldly but aggressive, evangelism, or grim social reformism? Satire shows us our foibles, but rarely proposes new ways of being. Behind all the jokes and gags, the Simpson’s show implies a deep religious hunger, a hunger for an engaged and authentic life of faith in which good ideas are practiced. Such hunger, of course, cannot be satisfied by watching TV, even though Homer calls it his "teacher, mother and secret lover." Such a hunger cannot even be satisfied by good books filled with allusions to better literature. But attention must be paid to those longings so deep that they are silently affirmed in even the most irreverent popular satire. To surface those longings, to name them, to bring them out of the silence, these are the first steps of the greater journey. ©The Rev. Dr. Barbara Merritt, 2001 |
| In 1972-73, I lived in Paris for almost a year. Part
of my curriculum in seminary was a "non-residency" program that required
living over-seas, and having an in-depth experience of another culture.
I chose Paris, and went to fulfill my fantasy of living in a garret, and being a freelance writer. The garret was in the oldest section of Paris, the Marais, where all my friends lived. My apartment was located in a tiny hotel, the Hotel Des Celestins, on Rue Des Lions. It was a fourth floor, walk-up attic room, with a sink, a hot plate, and a bathroom down the stairs. (If my memory serves me, it cost around $200 a month.) From the window, I could look out over the rooftops of Paris. When I got up in the wee hours of the morning to meditate, the nightclub across the street was just closing its door. I could sit in complete silence. It was a family-owned and operated hotel. They were friendly to the "divinity student" who lived in their attic. Another young woman also lived at the hotel. One day I met her in the hallway with a man she introduced as her "uncle." Another day, she introduced another man as a "cousin." It took only a few of these encounters before I realized that some of the hotel rooms were rented by the hour, and that this particular young woman was what we called, back then, "a working girl." Even if the hotel was a bit run down (having been built in the 1400's), it fit both my budget and my Bohemian self-image. The neighborhood itself was a wonderful mixture of blue collar, working class Parisians, and wealthy apartment dwellers. I think we had the best bakery in the city on Rue St. Paul, where the dough was never frozen, and the fresh baguettes in the morning were the happiest way to start any day. In that neighborhood, people developed a close and important relationship with each shop owner. I returned to the Marais twenty-five years later. And the neighborhood had profoundly changed. I was broken-hearted. The bakery had closed and had been replaced by an expensive antique shop. All the run-down sections had been gentrified. Working people could no longer afford to live in the area. But the Hotel des Celestins was still there! I approached with hope that the family was still operating the twelve-room hotel. But "quelle horreur!" It had been transformed into an exclusive, and very costly, Inn. The least expensive room was $250 a night! Who knows what they were charging for the attic (now apparently…the penthouse). It was Heraclitus, in ancient times (approximately 500 B.C.E.), who sounded the warning that "you cannot step twice into the same river…for other waters are continually flowing in." This was true of a small hotel in the Marais. It is also true of our religious community. Each Sunday I do an intuitive, informal roll call. I am constantly amazed and delighted by who shows up. I almost always wonder about the many who are absent. Mostly, I am aware of what a unique difference each individual worshipper makes to a religious service. It's not the way you sing the hymns, or the seat you sit in. I believe it has more to do with your laughter, your smile, your tears, your prayers, your particular longing for wholeness and peace. It is the way you greet a friend and the way you greet a stranger. Because so much of what we communicate is non-verbal, I suspect that we don't truly appreciate the power of our presence. Members of the parish, who have returned to the church after a long absence, often remark to me how much the church has changed; how different the worship feels to them. Seeing that we are using exactly the same liturgy, and the same minister is up front preaching (pretty much, various versions of the same sermon), and the hymns haven't changed, and the choir is singing mostly the timeless classics, it's fairly obvious to me what the visitor is observing. The entire tone and feel of the service is determined by who is in attendance. As the congregation is fed by the spiritual lives of new and active members, we look and feel like a whole new place. Every week. As the attendance changes, so does the church. It is always my hope that when you attend Sunday Services,
that you come away feeling spiritually nourished and more ready to meet
the challenges of your life. But please be aware; you are also a blessing
to your fellow worshippers. You help the rest of us.
|
| It was a great privilege, on Friday evening, for parents, siblings,
and grandparents to be invited to hear what eleven of our teenagers had
written about their religious beliefs. The worship service, held in the
Chapel, was the culmination of a year-long experience of study, discussion,
reading, and reflection. Activities included "a ropes" survival weekend,
a service project, seminars, and walking the labyrinth at All Saints. (A
member of the church asked me this Sunday, "Why can't we have such a program
for adults?" Good question! Let me know if you are interested.)
My favorite moment in the evening was after all of the statements had been read. There was a real diversity of religious beliefs expressed. We went to the dining room for dessert. And all the kids, who had such different ways of describing the world, God, and what they found trustworthy, all sat together laughing, sharing friendship and fellowship! Unitarian Universalism works! People who disagree theologically, can be an enormous blessing to one another. The full statements will be published, with names, by the Religious Education Committee. But I wanted the larger congregation to have a sampling. Here are a few lines I have taken from much larger statements. May they bless you on your journey.
"I have learned that one's beliefs flow through life…The knowledge that my beliefs can and will change over my lifetime has comforted me and given me the strength to voice my beliefs, disclaimer free. At this point in my life, as a 17 year old successful, privileged student with good friends, a family which she deeply cherishes, and a bright future, I believe that I am an atheist. I feel too in control of my world and too content with it to believe that there is a force greater than myself behind my happiness…Perhaps those of an older generation will think me foolish and juvenile to say this. They will say that Life plays tricks on you, and just when you think you're getting what you want, something will happen to take it out of your reach. But those moments are precisely what I meant when I said that life experiences alter one's beliefs. I'll worry about those times when they come, and if it means believing in a stronger power, then so be it, I'm open to change." and is behind all natural existences. The universe and planet Earth are inspirations of the holy thing. Things that are holy to me are elements of nature, and all existences for which mankind is not responsible. It is an inexplicable miracle how millions of species and a fertile planet arose from a single bang and an infinite amount of disorganized molecules…When I think about existence analytically, I think of a totally natural, scientific process with no overseeing creator or being….I speculate on the purpose of life. I believe it is something different for every person. I haven't figured out the purpose of my life yet. It might be to figure out as much as I can about the answer to this question. I also think that helping others to enjoy their lives is a major goal of living."
|
| By the time you read this, I will have started my vacation.
According to the conventional meaning, vacation is a period of time in
which the employee is paid to not work, but to rest, to relax, to re-charge
the batteries and to refresh the spirits.
Hear! Hear! That sounds like a good idea, (and I have heard that under the twin suns of the planet Zoomar, there are actual employees who rest from their labors while on vacation). Here on Earth (or at least among the leafy suburbs of
New England), vacation is that time when highly educated and
I have many projects planned and already afoot. My house is surrounded by the piled up rubble of a stockade fence I have already torn down. There is a large patch of blacktop in my miniscule backyard, which I will remove and have hauled away.And then I shall transform my little plot of God's green earth into a charming cottage garden, like something one would see in the Cotswalds. I also plan to paint some of the larger rooms of the house. Now mind you, I don't know how to do any of these things, nor do I have the proper tools. In fact, I have only the vaguest notion of where the Cotswalds actually are, or why they are so named. But I am absolutely sure that the whole experience will be refreshing to my soul and restful in ways I cannot yet imagine. Just like I am absolutely sure that I will make many new friends who wear orange vests and work at Home Depot. I do plan to escape my labors for a few things. On Thursday, May 17th, I will be at the Worcester Interfaith meeting at Trinity Lutheran Church. Worcester Interfaith, after a process of neighborhood meetings, has put together an agenda of five items for the city to consider, including branch libraries, after-school recreation programs, and improved sidewalks. I plan to be there to rally in support of these worthwhile goals and urge our elected officials to implement them. I also plan to make it to the final dinner event for the Affirmation program that some of our high school youth have been working on all year. I had a chance to spend time with them twice this year. One was a lunch discussion of Unitarian and Universalist history, including some of the history of this parish. The other was lunch discussion of worship and liturgy. (They were relieved to hear that not all of the adults were 100% attentive throughout the worship service either. Worship, after all, is supposed to be suggestive, to be evocative, and to make you think.) At a time in life when many young people lose interest in the religions of their families, the Affirmation class was digging deeper with interest and enthusiasm. Of course, I will come out to honor them at the end of their efforts. The real problem is that our senior minister, the Rev. Dr. Merritt, has forbidden me to come into the office while on vacation. I had been hoping to sneak over and spend a day or two, curled up with a good book in my office, a quiet and peaceful environment far from the reproach of unfinished tasks and deferred domestic dreams. I guess I will have to go to the library instead. ©Thomas Schade, 2001 |
| My wife and I recently marked our 25th wedding anniversary.
I say “marked” rather than celebrated because, like most years, we have
not yet gotten around to doing anything very celebratory for the occasion.
Maybe this weekend, we will get away for a fine dining experience in a
nicer restaurant. We have always underplayed this thing, beginning with
our shockingly informal and haphazardly planned engagement, wedding and
honeymoon. Sue already mentioned in church that I proposed over the phone,
calling from the salad bowl factory where I worked to the phone company
where she worked. Somehow, the story makes me sound like the workaholic.
At least, I took our whole wedding day off; she went to work on the morning
of our wedding day, because the courthouse was just across the street.
I can’t blame her, if the groom is going to wear a leisure suit and earth
shoes, why spend a lot of time taking photographs? Our only excuse is that
it was the Ford Administration and the whole country was experiencing post
traumatic stress disorder.
The story of our wedding gets funnier to us as the years go by. Certainly, people have spent much more on their wedding, and been married for a much shorter time. I calculate that our wedding costs per day of marriage is around five cents. By way of contrast, Brad Pitt and Jennifer Anniston will need to be married nearly 55,000 years before their wedding cost per day of marriage drops down to a nickel. Nobody stays that cute for that long. I hope that these twenty five years have been good for Sue, because they have been very affirming to me. One of the most hurtful criticisms my mother ever made of me as a child was that while I seemed to care about people and causes all around the world, I did not seem to care about the people right around me. And she warned me that such selfishness would make living with me unpleasant, and that I would be lonely as a result. Life with Sue and my daughters finally convinced me that perhaps my mother had overstated her case back then, for her own reasons. I recommend to all, by the way, that you compare the reality of your life with your parents' most dire predictions of your fate. In most cases, you will see that you have done better than they feared. That knowledge should be good for the self-esteem. One of the great joys of a longer-term marriage is that so many people support you with advice, congratulations, and good wishes. People are pulling for you to make it. Oh, there are always some people who remind you that some marriages end in painful divorce at 30 or 35 years, but even they are just trying to be helpful. This public support is a great privilege. It is
a great injustice that gays and lesbians aren’t offered this same support
and good wishes for their
Our national discussion about gay marriage is far from over, and of course, many people have many different opinions. There are important legal and policy issues at stake. Speaking for myself, I have become aware of how much joy the memory of our inexpensive and low key wedding brings me, even with the leisure suit and earth shoes and all. I have become aware of how much we have been helped in our marriage by the continuing public celebration of our union. It seems like simple justice that this joy be extended to every couple who is willing to take the pledge to love forever. ©Thomas Schade, 2001 |
| The joy of Easter is best expressed in music. Standing
in the silence at sunrise gives us a hint about the mystery and the miracle.
Poetry attempts to tell us something important, that is occurring at a
deeper level than we might be able to imagine. Especially after a hard
winter, the casual observer might conclude that what is inert (rocks and
stones and boulders), will keep the tombs shut, and winter forever on the
land.
But then we feel a soft, warm breeze, and we smell the sweetness of a lily, and we see that the world seems to be suddenly filled with light. Poetry recognizes the reality of death and rocks, but it reminds us that there is always something more. From the poet, Wendell Berry…
Great deathly powers have passed:
From a poet, who is a member of this parish, Inger Gilbert… (for the full text of the poem click here) no water here, running amongst
the rocks
May this Easter open your imagination to new life,
©The Rev. Dr. Barbara Merritt, 2001 |
| You've heard the expression, "It is better to light one
candle than to curse the darkness"? Well, here at First Unitarian, we're
taking this hopeful and pragmatic advice to a whole new level. Just because
we're a church without a sanctuary or Sunday School classrooms (and likely
to remain so for the indefinite future), doesn't mean we're hiding our
light under a bushel.
Come by First Unitarian any evening. The new halogen lights directed onto the freshly painted and restored steeple have created a stunning and beautiful new illumination to our church and to the city skyline. The lights, a gift from Ivan Spear in memory of his wife Hope, were awaiting the completion of the new roof. Now that the lights are fully operational, the exterior architectural beauty of this church can be seen from miles away. We should all take some small consolation, that a part of the work of restoration is completed. "It is better to light one steeple, than to curse an empty, mold-ridden, scaffold-filled sanctuary." The engineers and architects and mold experts are working hard at the "mold mitigation." For those of you who missed the congregational informational meeting, you might not have heard that construction in the main church came to a dead halt in mid-January, when mold was spotted behind the brackets in the ceiling. When scientific testing was done, it was clear that we had a severe mold problem. The massive amounts of water used to put out the June fire had soaked into the cellulose insulation in the attic. The wet insulation then traveled into the cavities in the walls, under the pulpit and into the balconies. Cellulose, we have come to learn, is an ideal food for mold and bacterial growth. While the exact procedures and contract specifications for this specialized clean-up are still coming in, the most likely product to be used in the restoration is ordinary bleach. But in order to get to where the mold is growing, it is likely that the wall behind the pulpit will have to be removed, as well as some of the sub-flooring in the balconies. If everything goes smoothly (and when do construction projects go smoothly?), if the insurance company swiftly approves the considerable expenditure to remedy the mold problem, the soonest we can return to the sanctuary is December 21, 2001. I suggest we hold this goal and this date "lightly" in our minds and hearts. Tom Shade's April Fool's sermon suggested that instead of bleach, we try to import some mold eating lizards, who would be controlled by lizard-eating cats, whose population would be kept down by predatory birds, mainly osprey, that would keep watch from the balconies and the chandeliers. Birds can be messy, so Tom also suggested marksmen/markspeople/marxists who could shoot the large lizards that were interrupting Sunday worship. Probably we'll go with the bleach. No one could have ever described to me how long, and how difficult, it would be to rebuild a church. Now that it looks like we'll be in exile for at least a year and a half, we are approaching new dangers. We can't attract as many new members. We'll lose impatient members, exhausted leadership, and those for whom the beauty and the elegance of our sacred space in the sanctuary was crucial to their worship experience. Two years is a long time not to hear the organ, if the pipe organ is what speak to you of the holy. In the next few weeks, every member of the parish who has not yet contributed to the Phoenix Fund will be receiving a phone call. Please know that the very future of this parish is dependent upon your generosity. Ten months after the fire, all fond illusions that the insurance company will cover most of our costs have disappeared. We have already reached the policy limits on rental and other business losses. The expenses of an elevator and handicapped bathroom for children are high. Our early estimates of what it would cost to build stronger and better are now actual bids by contractors. What we thought would cost of $500,000 is now $865,000…if we get the waiver for a limited access elevator. Our costs will exceed one million dollars, if we have to put in a full size elevator. Members of the parish have now pledged a little over $400,000. As always, the church is dependent on the grace of God, and the generosity of its members. As each of us struggles with the challenges that have been put before us, it's worth stopping by in the evening to look at the steeple. "A light shines in the darkness." We're still here. We intend to be here for a long time. ©The Rev. Dr. Barbara Merritt, 2001 |
| I have never cared much for the poet, Kahlil Gibran. Perhaps he was
over-used in the 1960's. Maybe he is just too "flowery" a style for my
particular taste. But no one, to my knowledge, even described parenting
in more concise words than Gibran.
"Your children are not your children…
When children are small, parents can project an amazing amount of expectation and fantasy concerning a child's gifts and potential. As you introduce them to hiking in the mountains, you can imagine them growing up to be environmentalists. With their first art course, you can see their hidden undeveloped talent. As they show strength in particular areas of academia, you can't help but wonder whether they might follow in the footsteps of your own intellectual curiosity. It was no accident that when I was selecting books at the library (before my own children could read), there was a heavy emphasis on mythology, and fairy tales. When my husband made the choices, there were always lots of animal stories and adventures. One of the ongoing underlying dynamics in our home is that one parent (the Dad) teaches physics, and loves science, math, and technology. The Mom (me) is completely liberal arts; history, literature, psychology, and philosophy, as well as world religions. I am not aware that either of us have ever pressured our children to go in one direction or another, but we have been observant. We've been watching to see what the children would choose. So it was astonishing to both parents, when Robert, our oldest child, announced last summer that he was going to go into business for himself. Business! That is neither fish nor fowl! That is neither the Mother's nor the Father's area of expertise, knowledge, or experience. But our Senior in high school had been reading his business magazine and decided that he was going to become an entrepreneur. He would be the founder of an on-line coffee business. He would be the middleman between a wholesale coffee roaster, and the cyberspace gourmet coffee consumer. In addition, this venture would fill the requirements for his senior research project. My instantaneous response was, "You can't do that! You're only 16! You have no idea how difficult it is to start a business! And we can't help you at all…we don't know anything about marketing a product!" And like any normal sixteen year old, he completely ignored my counsel. He went to banks, and arranged credit. He hired classmates and friends to design a web site. (They are to be paid with a percentage of the "profits.") He obtained insurance; he bought the software and security to handle credit card purchases…he found a wholesaler and worked out prices and shipping. The photographs for the site were taken of his buddies sipping coffee in our living room. My role, meanwhile, is to roll my eyes and to tell him "this will never work." Over the last several months, I have done everything in my power to discourage what I consider to be an impossible assignment for a high school student. I believe my resistance to the project is partly because my first born is now navigating waters that I have never visited. Ican't setup a business web site. I don't have a clue as to how you go about buying software to allow you to accept credit cards on line. I can't tell a good marketing strategy from a bad one. In the nine months that the project has taken, there have been countless setbacks. Each time, I'm the one who has encouraged my son to give up and move on. To his great credit, he hasn't listened to me. And when I have complained to my husband about the hundreds of hours our son has poured into this dream, he has calmly reminded me that Robert is to be congratulated for his persistence; that he has learned a great deal from this Senior project, and that I should consider a few of the terrible, dangerous, alternative activities that teenagers have been known to pursue. Two weeks ago, we got a call from a salesman, asking if Robert Merritt was the marketing supervisor for TheRightBean.com. We didn't tell him that the founder of the company was attending class. We didn't mention that Mr. Merritt was also in charge of publicity, purchasing, advertising, technical maintenance, finances, deliveries, and payroll. And then last week, what I thought could never happen, happened. The site became fully operational. Coffee orders are starting to come in. And the founder of the company is smiling a lot. "Not even in my dreams" would I have imaged that my child would enter e-commerce. I have no idea if this is just the beginning of a promising career path, or simply one more exploration that will help him decide where he really wants to invest himself. Here's the surprise. I don't know. I don't know what is best for another human being. I certainly don't know what work will give the greatest satisfaction to my son. Time should prove to be a much wiser instructor. My ignorance is not just limited to parenting. I don't know what God wants from any of us. I don't know when our congregation will actually be back in our sanctuary. I don't know how the resources and gifts of our leadership will shape the church of the future. I know there are risks and I know there will be setbacks. I know that we will be trying our best. TheRightBean.com is a good spiritual teaching for at least one skeptical mother. All of us are called into the business of creating unimaginable futures. Lao Tzu instructs us how to get where we need to go. "Walk on." ©The Rev. Dr. Barbara Merritt, 2001 |
We observed during the last few Congregational Meetings that the recommendations from the Prudential Committee were being energetically debated and there was a high degree of enthusiasm for these discussions. We heard your voices and understand that the time has come to invite all of you to join us in building upon the Mission and visions adopted by our Congregation a few years ago. To be sure that First Unitarian moves in the direction we want, we will use a process based upon the "Woods Meetings" successfully used in the private sector.©Brian Ota, 2001 Chairman, Finance Committee Prudential Committee Member |
Because of all the snow, it was a very short work week. But that didn't keep it from being a few of the worst days I can recall. The particulars are unimportant. Suffice it to say that (1) a defective fire alarm (that seriously disrupted the sleep of some of our most committed volunteers at 2:00 a.m., and that continued to scream its head-splitting, nerve-shattering noise when the regular staff arrived), (2) a boiler malfunction that turned the furnace room into a steam room, and (3) no heat in the building for two days, were the least of my troubles. It was just one of those weeks at the church where nearly everything that could go wrong, did: where nearly everything that could break, broke. My computer crashed, and then so did I.©The Rev. Dr. Barbara Merritt, 2001 |
I didn't really mind driving my kids to a downhill ski resort in Vermont last Saturday. While it is a long drive, it is also a beautiful one. And when you're in a car for several hours with your teenage sons, there is actually a better than even chance you'll get to have a conversation (something usually avoided by busy adolescents).©The Rev. Dr. Barbara Merritt, 2001 |
Early in my ministry, I went to a seminar taught by a Master teacher, who was going around the country helping high school teachers refocus and re-energize themselves professionally. He stated that the only teachers he was ever able to help were those who had at least one beloved teacher in their own childhood. Once they had a model, a mentor, a memory to recall of what it meant to be "well-taught" and "cared for," they were able to go on and be that wonderful teacher for their own students. Those teachers who had no wonderful teachers to imitate, those teachers who were trying to be good teachers by simply implementing abstract theories were far less successful in their professional lives.©The Rev. Dr. Barbara Merritt, 2001 |
| The annual Parish Services Sunday last March focused on "Memory and
the Community of Faith." Following the service, committee members hosted
an open forum on the care of individuals with Alzheimer's disease. The
response was overwhelmingly positive, stirring personal reflections and
opening channels of communication. The collective antennae of the Committee
was twisting and turning, picking up vibrations of a perceived need among
the members of our parish.
The Committee developed a survey to assess those needs. Perhaps we have members dealing with this dreadful disease, loved ones who are losing their memories, and care providers in need of support and assistance. The primary goal of the survey was to determine the actual needs of the parish. Developing approaches to meet those needs was the secondary goal. After the telephone survey was completed, we reviewed the gathered information. It was determined that the Parish Service Committee should most definitely develop a plan to provide a functional service for many of our members. Although our timing may be less than swift, our desire to continue with bringing this idea through to fruition has remained intact. Somehow more time has elapsed than we had expected in the development of our proposal. Life can be that way. We are now ready to roll out our plan. Through several meetings of the minds, we have developed a format for a support group that will be both information and emotionally healing. The concept is similar to that of a book club. The church will provide a lending library of books dealing with Alzheimer's disease. The Alzheimer's Association has an extensive list of publications that we will be using as a referral source. Suggestions will also be greatly appreciated. Rather than discuss a particular book in its entirety, as a book club would do, we will be talking about segments of each book. Perhaps there is a passage that is particularly meaningful that we can relate to and share our own personal thoughts. A poem or an article may be chosen as the topic for discussion. Also, there may be a story telling session of our own creation. "Lost Stories: A Support Group for People Caring for Loved Ones With
Memory Loss," will be conducted by
—Helen Campbell, Chair
|
|
We all know the need for the money: the church fire and our efforts to rebuild the church stronger and better than it was before. And we all know that the stated goal of the Phoenix fund of $500,000 is probably too low for all that we know that we need and certainly not enough for all that we suspect we will need to do in the next few years. But I am sure that when you consider your Phoenix Fund pledge, you will not be thinking about whether the church really needs the money. You will be thinking about what you can afford. But what you can afford is a slippery concept, and brings up other issues. What does it mean to be able to afford to give away money? On the one hand, you could say that you can afford to give away everything you don’t need for the bare essentials of life – food, shelter, and clothing. By that standard, $10,000 is a very small donation for many of us. That $10,000 does not stand between my family and hunger, or giving the house back to the bank. It does not even stand between us and not saving for our retirement or not going on another vacation. If it did, I would not give it to the church, nor should you. But at the other extreme, I can think of many potential uses for that $10,000, sometime in the future. I can imagine many scenarios in which still having that $10,000 would be useful. Potential disaster, after all, lurks around every corner. People lose their jobs; people get sick; depressions, both personal and economic, are slid into. And even though I will die, and, thus, need no more cash, I can imagine that it would make my children’s lives easier. But if I only give away the money that I cannot imagine someday needing, I will never give anything to anybody. I would always ignore the real needs of the present in favor of preparing against my worries about possible future dangers. And I would have to leave the task of supporting the church only to those whose great wealth shields them from every potential adverse circumstance. But nobody is so wealthy that they don’t worry. My point is that once you get beyond the bare necessities, there is no objective standard about what you, or I, can afford. It is driven by our anxieties about the future. Some people say that our anxiety level is a spiritual question. That is almost true, but not quite. It is not as if the spiritually advanced don’t worry about the future, because they have a special note from God that protects them from disaster, illness or need. There are no such notes, and it’s foolish to count on one. But it is equally foolish to believe that if I hang on to my $10,000 my family and I will be protected. Our gift to the Phoenix fund is our gift to the future. Instead of fearing the future, Sue and I are trying to shape it in ways that express our values. Our contribution of $10,000 to the Phoenix Fund is part of an ongoing investment that we are making in the future of the communities in which we live: this church, the wider religious community, the Worcester community at large. We will have only a few opportunities to make a significant gift to future generations; this is one. We believe that one way to prepare for an uncertain future is to embed ourselves in vital and healthy communities as free and responsible members. While it is melodramatic to pose it as an either-or question, it is sobering to ask whether we would rather be poor in a healthy community with spiritually vital churches, or wealthy in a soulless dog-eat-dog world. I am honest enough to admit that I want both a vital church and my own comfort; our pledge of $10,000 tries to serve both goals. But it is my hope that its example, and these words, will embolden your generosity as you consider (or reconsider) your Phoenix Fund contribution. |
|
But this year has been especially demanding on my winter-loving soul. Not having had my summer vacation (because of the church fire) has made all the extra hours devoted to insurance meetings and design decisions seem longer. The Rev. Mr. Schade and I were finding that as our exhaustion increased, our tempers got shorter. We knew we needed some time away on retreat, to get ourselves back on track. We invited as our retreat master and consultant, our esteemed colleague, the Rev. Carl Scovel. And we decided that the best place to be restored and refreshed and relaxed was on a warm beach in Florida. All the Puritan arguments, that it is better to suffer and shiver, were disregarded. In the face of my bone deep fatigue and with a genuine need to have some uninterrupted, in-depth conversation about the nature of ministry and how we might serve God and the church, we flew away for a three day retreat in southwest Florida. Allow me to say that I have converted to the wisdom of a "winter break." Carl was a superb teacher and resource. His 44 years in our ministry, as well as his spiritual insight and wisdom, helped Tom and me to see the structures and disciplines we need to implement; structures that will help us to understand one another better, and to work more effectively together. All of our rich and enlivening conversation and meditation took place in a context of warm breezes and the larger perspective of sea, sky and tropical splendor. Carl had us spend a great deal of our time at the J.N. Darling National Wildlife Refuge on Sanibel Island. Theological ponderings have a different impact when you are hiking in the presence of beautiful exotic birds and alligators. We were given ample opportunity to pay attention and to focus on what was essential. The most healing exercise for me was a kayak trip through Tarpon Bay where we took a four mile canoe trail through a red mangrove forest. As our three kayaks entered the trail, the tide was coming in. We found that our boats were effortlessly being carried along a dark and lovely stream. All we had to do was to sit back and allow the currents to float us through a magical woods, filled with egrets and herons, ospreys and white pelicans. Occasionally we would dip in a paddle to steer slightly to the right or the left, but this was the extent of our exertion. I felt a peace I have not experienced in a very long time. I felt held, and comforted, and consoled. As we drifted along, it was easy to believe in a grace that would take us wherever we needed to go. But all good trails must eventually come to an end. And the tide was still coming in. We needed to go back the same two miles of crooked, winding water, only this time with the tide against us. What was an ambling, and extravagantly relaxing inward voyage, became a vigorous and relentless return trip. My shoulders ached. My back ached. And the watery trail seemed to be about twice as long as I remembered it being on the way in. (I thought this would be an opportune time for the Associate minister to tow the Senior minister, but he wasn't buying.) The only way out was with prolonged and strenuous work. In the narrower and the shallower passages, the current was especially swift. The broader and deeper places were negotiated with slightly less effort. There were times I thought we would be in that mangrove thicket forever. But after enough determined strokes, we eventually reentered the calm and open waters of the bay, whereupon we only had to paddle another three quarters of a mile to get back to the boathouse! One stream. One river. One path. There were moments on the way that were sweet and effortless and lovely beyond imagining. Same stream. Same river. Same path. I became exhausted, discouraged and impatient. In life, as well as in a kayak, sometimes it is possible to "go with the flow." Other occasions call for us to use all of our strength to face the particular challenges of that time and place. If you are like all the rest of us, you will experience both. I come back from this retreat with a new appreciation and gratitude for the tides of our lives that rise and fall. They carry us forward, and they demand all of our strength. And there is beauty, and there are surprises around every bend. |
|
The Rev. Merritt and The Rev. Schade
Significant growth is not a choice; it is a fiscal imperative. Now, I hear that there are some within our congregation who are not yet persuaded that we should try to grow the church, who are uncertain, or who have reservations. I have not been able to attend congregational forums where growth has been discussed, so I have not heard their reasoning or their feelings. Perhaps there is the sentiment that the church is just the right size now, that a larger congregation would feel uncomfortable. Perhaps there is the feeling that there are already too many new people to know, and too many new faces make one feel uneasy, like a stranger in one's own parish. I understand and sympathize with such attitudes, for my Sunday attendance has been irregular and my participation in other church activities has been infrequent. When I do attend, I am amazed at how different the church seems to be. However, growth and change has been underway for the last twenty years, and we are all the better for it. I am reminded of the words of our then Minister Emeritus, Wallace Robbins, who upon one of his last addresses to the congregation -- it was at an annual meeting in the Bancroft Room—prophesied that the church would grow and that the composition of the membership would gradually change (it was already changing then), and he added that some of us might not like it. Well, he welcomed that change. Here we are, 16 or 18 years later — we have participated in that growth and change, and we like it. Moral: Do not fear growth and change; it is the lifeblood of institutional development and human thriving. Like all human institutions, our church must remain vibrant in order to survive for the long haul. It must adapt, while remaining true to its mission, in order to thrive. We must run in order merely to stand still. If we wish to retain all that we now have about the church that we cherish, we must rise to the challenge to plan for and work for growth. We have the talents, the resources to make this happen, if only we will commit positively and energetically to this task. The alternative to growth is to withdraw from our mission, to stagnate, to decline. Growth is not a choice; it is an imperative. We enjoy a stupendous array of religious offerings in our parish which nourish the spiritual, emotional, aesthetic, and intellectual lives of our members and friends. Our ministries of preaching, our ministries of pastoral care, our ministry of music, our ministry of religious education, Transformations, meditation meetings, Bible study classed, Monday night programs, christenings, weddings, funerals, social activities all sustain and enrich our lives in multiple ways. I ask you doubters of growth, why wouldn't we want to share all that with many other folks? Why wouldn't we want to extend our rich heritage of diversity, inclusiveness, openness, seeking for truth, meaning or inspiration…extend this Unitarian Universalist heritage to our neighbors, friends, or visitors who come by? Why wouldn't we want to extend the hand of fellowship to all those who would gladly accept our mission and join and journey with us? Why should we want to keep it to ourselves? Forget the fiscal imperative for a moment. It is a human imperative. ©Norman L. Richardson
|
|
But again and again, I come to a place where all my experience and understanding are not enough. I’ve tried all my tricks and what worked before is no longer working. The situation is clearly out of my control. I don’t know how to fix things. I don’t know what to do. My first response, at this point, is to feel like I should have done better. If only I had worked harder or been smarter, this would not have happened. Recently, however, I am beginning to come to the curious perspective that these very times where I seem to have failed are the moments of true possibility. Most of the time I live contentedly within the bubble of my life. I have created understandings of the world that are reasonably effective in getting me what I want. These internal road maps allow me to filter the overwhelming data of life into a coherent and manageable picture. My ability to do this is a prerequisite to sanity - to being able to operate in the world as we know it. But it is these very understandings that also limit me. My road maps are based on what has happened to us in the past, and whatever comes up that does not fit my picture is usually deleted or reconceived to fit in. What is truly new is excluded because it threatens the stability of my world. It is only when I run out of competence, when I lose my perspective, when I show up empty handed with nothing to offer but my willingness to be present, that something new can emerge. It requires me to have the faith that what is required of me is not “the answer,” but rather an openness to the possibility that might be emerging. When I allow myself to actually pay attention to what is happening in the place of anxiety, fear, and not-knowing, I create the space for life to unfold beyond the limits of my thinking. Unfortunately, and fortunately, this all requires that I give up playing God. To allow space to experience the miracle of life, I have to give up the illusion that I am in control. While this sounds sensible and even slightly romantic, my experience of coming face to face with my inability to control the world is quite painful. Somewhere, deep inside, I still believe that it is up to me to make things right in the world. While this makes no rational sense to me, I continue to take on this overwhelming responsibility without even being aware of it. The moments when it doesn’t work out, when I have not been able to pull things together or even make sense of things - these are the only times I have the opportunity to experience the amazing reality of something beyond myself that moves the world. The truth is, I would rather do it myself. I would rather have the power to make everything turn out right. But since this appears to be an unattainable goal, I am learning to be more curious about my failures. When communication breaks down, when my plans are totally shot, when I’ve just made some terrific blunder - this is the intense, but fertile, ground of my life. My job is to show up empty-handed, to pay attention to what is happening, and have the faith that something much better than I could have imagined is emerging. |
|
The questions we see during the January service often fall into categories. "Why do we honor the Christian tradition and the heritage of the free church?" "How do you define God?" And especially this Sunday, perhaps not surprisingly, considering all the tragic headlines, "How can you theologically explain volcanoes, earthquakes, and wars?" Personally, I have never found any intellectual response that adequately addresses tragedy. How could any human argument justify such innocent and terrible suffering? There are literally thousands of books written on the subject of evil, adversity, oppression, and human sorrow. But words and theories and sophisticated theology do not have the power to explain why we find ourselves in a creation of good and evil, creation and destruction, life and death. No matter what you think about the source of the sometimes immensely difficult reality that we are surrounded by, the more significant question is, "What will our response be to the reality of human suffering?" In a front page story in the New York Times (1/28/01) about the recent terrible earthquake in India, I was stunned to read, at the end of the article, about the international help that is being offered. Germany has promised $1 million dollars in immediate aid, and Norway, over a million. The Netherlands has promised about $420,000. Even Pakistan, India's archenemy, has responded with medicine and rescue equipment. Another nation that has had a historically unfriendly relationship with India, China, has offered $50,000. And then we learn what the richest and most powerful country in the world has volunteered, and I quote, "The United States offered an initial $25,000 and said more would be available if requested. A statement from President Bush said he was saddened and extended condolences of the American people." Was the reporter mistaken? Was it a typographical error? Or is our nation's initial response genuinely that miserly? No matter how you attempt to understand suffering: as original sin, or the paying off of bad karma, or a random universe taking out some expendable members of the biosphere...it is our response to the tragedy that makes all the difference. Are we called to be compassionate? Generous? Involved? Engaged? The world that presents itself to us is mysterious; sometimes
frustrating and heartbreaking, often uncertain and unpredictable, occasionally
breathtakingly beautiful, and frequently perplexing and confounding. The
religious question is, "What are YOU going to do about it?" Or to put it
more specifically, "What am I going to do about it?"
|
| A recent essay in Newsweek by Anna Quindlen was especially pertinent
this week. She writes that the new roof, being put on her house (which
is supposed to last for 100 years)…"feels like the closest we will come
to eternity." She uses the work on her roof as a metaphor, for a mother's
work raising her children, and writes:
Mothering consists largely of transcendent scut work, which seems contradictory, which is exactly right. How can you love so much someone who drives you so crazy and makes such constant demands? How can you devote yourself to a vocation in which you are certain to be made peripheral, if not redundant? How can we joyfully embrace the notion that we have ceased to be the center of our own universe? I suspect the world is full of transcendent scut work. I am especially fond of the summertime variety. Puttering in the garden; cleaning a closet; shucking corn; beach combing; peeling potatoes for a potato salad to take on a picnic; fixing up the boat; the backyard; the garage; the attic or the basement. It is work, to be sure…putting a little order into the chaos. And yet, when we suddenly have the time to entertain friends and family, the labor can seem almost fun, and some of the tasks leave us full of energy and hope. The popular song, from Porgy and Bess, claims "Summertime, and the living is easy." I have always reveled in the sweet anticipation that there might come a season where life would be smooth, and easy, and care free. But, as I get older, I am more willing to entertain the possibility that fulfillment and frustration go hand in hand. I can't banish what is contradictory in myself, or in my environment, not even in July, not even on vacation. Anna Quindlen expresses it most eloquently; what seems "contradictory" is "exactly right." So as the new copper roof goes up at First Unitarian, please understand that it is a wonderful accomplishment, even as it poses a real temporary parking challenge. It will be beautiful, and very messy. As Quindlen writes, it is a most practical, ordinary and utilitarian project, and yet there is a magnificence, a transcendence at the very heart of our ongoing effort. |
| Sue and I had the opportunity to spend the Memorial Day weekend with
YRU2, the church's high school group, at their annual retreat in Craigville.
Twenty-five members of the group and five of their advisors were present.
We went to the beach, played volleyball and enjoyed some free time. The
group also conducted some important business on their retreat, bringing
in new members from the eighth grade and marking the graduation of the
outgoing seniors. They elected next year's officers.
In our church mission statement, we say that we are called to live in "right relationship with each other." Since the phrase "right relationship" is somewhat vague and open-ended, I am always looking for clues as to what it might actually mean. What better place to look than among the young people, where the future of the church is being formed? This is what I learned among the young about what it means to live in "right relationship."
I am encouraged. ©The Rev. Thomas Schade, 2000 |
| I am always a little startled when a Catholic priest articulates my
faith with great eloquence. Perhaps because the Roman tradition and ritual
is so foreign from my own liberal experience, or perhaps because the leadership
is exclusively male, I make the false assumption that the orthodox must
encounter the world in a different way than those of us who call ourselves
skeptics, and heretics, and free thinkers.
But a recent essay in the New York Times Magazine showed me that, once again, I have underestimated how powerfully truth makes itself known in every tradition. When Lorenzo Albacete, a priest and a professor theology at St. Joseph's seminary writes about his experience hearing confession, I find myself in complete agreement, as to the essence of the religious conversation and the purpose of the religious enterprise. I quoted Father Albacete in my sermon Sunday, but Monday morning, I'm still pondering his point of view; both in what he claims is not central to the spiritual life, as well as what is. Albacete writes that, "Confession is not therapy, nor is it moral accounting…the language of the inner life is not the language of experts, nor of eloquent dramatists, nor of a mature and healthy self-acceptance." I can't begin to tell you how many visitors come to this parish hoping that being part of a church will give them a therapeutic cure and a formula for maintaining high moral standards and accomplishing good works. They come seeking a theologically sophisticated vocabulary, beautiful music, ritual and entertainment, and at the very least, God and the church are expected to make them feel better about themselves and their world. I suppose the reason we come with such hopes is because we are human. And when the secular world doesn't satisfy our deepest needs, we can entertain a momentary optimism that religion will smooth the way, perfect our character, and improve our odds for success and satisfaction. It shouldn't surprise us that there are, in fact, religions which promise therapeutic cures, and immediate salvation, with messages that roughly translate, "Here you will find comfort, release from suffering, and a new life, free from all the old limitations." Thus, it is astonishing to read how Albacete describes what the interior life has to offer: "The ultimate truth of our interior life is our absolute poverty, our radical dependence, our unquenchable thirst, our desperate need to be loved…the language of the inner life is a serene silence, a deep hurt, a boundless desire and occasionally, a little laughter." Now here is a list of spiritual qualities that gives, at least this religious liberal, pause. * "Absolute poverty?" Am I expected to disclose that in public? Jesus taught us, "Blessed are the poor in spirit," but an awful lot of religious life is posturing about how much we know, how much knowledge we have accumulated, how much success we have achieved, how far we have traveled. But sometimes our "little faith" is no faith. Sometimes all we can bring to God is our confusion, our lostness, and our need. * "Radical dependence?" We UU's prefer to talk about being independent, or at most, interdependent. What if we admitted to ourselves, and to others, just how utterly dependent we are on kindness and encouragement? * "Unquenchable thirst?" St. Augustine said it best, "My heart will be restless, till it rests in Thee." But there seems to be some sort of cultural conspiracy that claims that if we're not satisfied with who we are, and what we have, there is something wrong with us. * "Our desperate need to be loved?" UU's will rarely admit to being desperate about anything in our inner lives, let alone openly confess to this most basic of human needs for affirmation and acceptance. Maybe this is only the sort of truth that can be whispered in a confessional booth, but I can't help but wonder how we would treat one another, if we realized that everyone desperately needs to be loved…almost all of the time. What I do know is that truth shows up in some unlikely places; sometimes in the New York Times, and sometimes in religious traditions very different from our own. The truth at the heart of the human soul, can be touched in silence. It shows up in our joy, as well as in our deepest hurt. I believe that God (and truth and reality), are hiding in the midst of our jumbled and conflicting desires. And sometimes, sometimes it is only our laughter that keeps us going. I hope you will feel welcome in a congregation full of people who are
struggling with poverty, dependence, thirst, and our need for one another.
If you get to know us, you'll discover we're a lot like you.
|
|
Why do people join a church? Tom and I joined the religious community called Countryside Unitarian Universalist Church in Palatine, Illinois in 1989 because we were lonely and needed religious education for our young daughters. Is your own experience so different? At Countryside, we did find that community. There were Circle Suppers each month, and annual events such as the Talent Auction and church picnic. We were involved in the choir, social action, church governance, and the youth group. We found ourselves in a community of people where we could both give and receive. When we headed to Dallas in 1995, it was very hard to say goodbye to Countryside Church. As Tom began his studies for the ministry, we started having a different relationship to churches. But it was hard to find my place among 500 members at First Unitarian Dallas. It was not until I joined the choir, that I began to feel connected. When Tom became the intern minister at a church in a Dallas suburb, I was welcomed with open arms as the spouse of the new intern minister. Horizon Church was proud of their growing membership and many, many opportunities to get involved. Everyone finds their place early on at Horizon - not just the intern minister's spouse. When we arrived here, the welcome was even greater. As the spouse of the new associate minister, I never have to wander coffee hour alone and hope someone will talk to me. I never have to find my seat in the sanctuary, and hope someone will catch my eye and smile, happy to see me again. But many others do. David Rynick has put this need for community connection very well -
"In a society where we are all increasingly busy and isolated one from
another, we consciously seek to build community. A community where we can
reconnect to the true sources of our life,
I've been working with other members who are passionate about church growth and making visiting, joining, and getting involved a positive experience. Working with Mike Lally and Kathleen Walker on the New Member Task Force, I've learned that it can be hard to feel connected here. They came from a small UU church here in New England and would like to see more social events like Circle Suppers and dances as a way for people to get to know one another. I had also heard that Lee Reid wanted to organize a dance but needed help. Mike, Kathleen and Lee were introduced to one another several weeks ago - they agreed to start planning Circle Suppers. As more eager souls joined the conversation, Something's Afoot emerged and they pulled off a dance just a few weeks later. Now this group, which includes Mike, Kathleen, Lee, Kathleen Cammarata, Diane Reilly, Sue Carpenter, and Lauren Ota have reconstituted the Social Committee. There's no stopping them. In support of our mission and values, they intend to help people feel welcome, and to help people get to know new people. They seek to strengthen our friendships and build our community through social activities and fun events. The first dance was such a success, there's another one scheduled for June 17th. They've locked in September 16th for a contra dance. For next year, they are trying to line up a singer/comedian for an evening of fun and planning Circle Suppers. If it is important to you to be part of a spiritual community and to have some fun at the same time, then you've come to the right place. —-Sue Schade
© Sue Schade, 2000 |
| We took care of one third of our backyard last year, with asphalt.
This hard, black surface has provided my children with a combination basketball
court and tennis backboard. It has provided my husband and I with one-third
less surface on which to grow grass.
I am sorry to report that last spring's excessive investment in lime, fertilizer, manure, peat moss, and grass seed has not borne much fruit. The yard is as pitiful an excuse for a lawn as it has ever been. I was warned. In April of 1999, parishioner, gardener and veterinarian, Dr. Wayne Rocheleau, prophesized the inherent dangers in attempting to grow grass. His email read in part: "…Let me assure you that you may succeed, but your success will be temporary...Even with all your best efforts, the soil may reject the covering you have planned for it…I am reminded of this because, while removing the detritus from my own perennial garden this afternoon, I was discouraged to see that the columbine I had planted two years ago is not doing so well. The plants just are not thriving...I carefully prepared the bed and tended to them diligently. They did fairly well the first year. They bloomed and set seed. They barely survived the next year and I gave them up for lost. Today though, just 24 feet from the prepared bed I made for them is a magnificent specimen of a columbine. This plant is thriving in a crack in the paving that separates the driveway from the brick walk and it has a neighbor growing from the crevice where the asphalt meets the concrete foundation of the house. Both of these plants are robust and I am sure they will bear beautiful flowers…We are constantly being prosecuted by a basic law of physics that says all things tend toward a lower state of energy unless we continually supply additional energy to maintain the order. But the corollary is not true. Sometimes, no matter how much energy we provide, we cannot create order from chaos. The columbine is just such a paradox. All the energy given to promoting the growth of the columbine at the location of my choice has gone for naught. Meanwhile, the genetic |